|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||
 |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
Codewalkers Forums Sponsor:
|
 AT&T devCentral & BlackBerry(r) Webcast Series: BlackBerry and GPS -Build Location Awareness into your BlackBerry Applications, July 10th-1:00PM EST. Register Today!
|
|
#1
July 21st, 2003, 09:45 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
[Risk] semi-final round
Just wanted to point out that the preferred method for placing the "survivors" in future rounds is 1-4-5-8 and 2-3-6-7, though based upon the premise that you were trying to give 1-2 a cake walk into the finals I can see the logic behind 1-2-7-8 and 3-4-5-6.
|
|
#2
July 23rd, 2003, 03:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
[Risk] RE: semi-final round
I think 1-2-7-8 is best... I believe this is called ironman seeding. Though it's been my own experience that if too much luck is present, 1 and 8 might actually be closer than expected!
|
|
| Viewing: Codewalkers Forums > PHP Contests > Older Contests > [Risk] semi-final round |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
Linear Mode
